The publication of a scientific report provides the whole Community with the opportunity to criticise and rely on the content of the report and is a step in which errors and errors of interpretation can be detected and corrected. Any new findings are being considered by the Community in the light of what is already known about the system under review and differences of opinion with established measures and interpretations must be justified. For example, some interpretation of an electrical measurement of a material can implicitly predict the results of an optical experiment. If the reported visual results do not agree with the electrical interpretation, it is unlikely that the latter is correct – although the measurements are letters and phones to facilitate a rapid exchange of results, plemented. Scientific meetings include regular poster sessions and press conferences, as well as formal presentations. Although research publications continue to document research results, the image of electronic publications and other information technologies has changed. In addition, plagiarism, the increase in the number of authors per article in certain areas, and the methods used to evaluate publications in the definition of appointments and promotions have reinforced concerns about the traditions and practices that have guided communication and publication. Different historical and conceptual perspectives can also influence expectations of standards of research practice. Some journalists, for example, have criticized several eminent scientists such as Mendel, Newton and Millikan for „cutting corners to impose their theories“ (Broad and Wade 1982, p.
35). Criticism suggests that all scientists should be subject to identical standards at all stages of their work. Many agreements can be certain, but it is by no means certain that citizens in the social and internal sector want their agreements to be legally binding. In Balfour/Balfour, Atkin LJ stated that Mr. Balfour`s agreement to pay $30 a month to his wife while working in Ceylon should be considered unenforceable, since people generally do not intend to draw the legal consequences. Similarly, an agreement between friends in a bar or a girl and her mother will fall into this sphere, but not a couple who is about to separate and not friends who make large transactions, especially when one is heavily dependent on the other`s assurances to his detriment.  This presumption of impracticality can always be rebutted by explicit consent, for example. B by the amortization of the agreement. On the other hand, it is considered almost conclusively that agreements between companies are enforceable.  But again, express words like „This provision… does not fall within the judicial jurisdiction of the courts.“  In one case, the law assumes that collective agreements between a union and an employer are not intended to establish legal relationships, allegedly to avoid excessive disputes under British labour law.
 Whether a legally binding agreement has been reached depends on the presence of all elements of a contractual relationship. If this is the case, the document could be an „intermediate contract“ until a full formal agreement is concluded or a simple contract in its current form. If all the elements are not in place, the pre-contracting documents may simply be an agreement that can be reached and such an agreement will not be legally binding. Validation and certification reports should be prepared by synthesizing the results obtained and commenting on any discrepancies observed. Deviations from established procedures should be documented and other measures should be taken to correct deviations and prevent their reappearance (corrective and preventive measures). CapA principles should be applied if necessary. Proof of satisfactory validation and receipt of a procedure or equipment should be provided and approved by appropriate staff.